Thursday, 15 January 2015

Nightcrawler Snubbed for Best Actor 2015 in Favour of Foxcatcher

Not caring too much for the Oscars I try not to get too worked up when I see that something or someone has been snubbed. I notice some people get really worked up about them, for me the ignorance of one hundred year old out of touch Academy members more amuses me than irritates. However right now I think I have a fair argument and opinion as to why Jake Gyllenhaal should have been nominated for Best Actor for his role in Nightcrawler either as well as Steve Carell for Foxcatcher or instead of. (In an ideal world where I decide everything film related, it would definitely have been instead of.)

In my opinion Steve Carell’s character in Foxcatcher was very superficially written and one dimensional. You understood his motivations in their most basic forms. He was rich but wanted to bring his own kind of honor to his family. He was willing to do anything to get it and we saw this through Steve Carell’s fair portrayal. But by the film’s conclusion, a question is still buzzing around the audience’s heads, why did he do that terrible thing at the end? Isn’t that what this film is mean’t to answer? Surely a true story, with this talented a director and these talented actors can’t end this abuptly and ambiguously after a two hour run time. The audience had so much time to understand John Du Pont’s motivations, and it just never happened.


Its easy to make the argument ‘sometimes psycopaths don’t have motivations in real life’ and that’s all well and good. But if you’re going to write a character who appears to have no clear or fleshed out motivations at least make them interesting. They don’t even have to be likeable just interesting. That is enough to keep the audience involved in the story and indeed the character. John De Pont wasn’t interesting, and that’s where his character differs from Gyllenhaal’s portrayal of Louis Bloom in Nightcrawler. Its true that you didn’t always understand Bloom’s motivations, and he absolutely was not a likeable character. But he was always interesting. You can always credit the writing for this but it always takes a great actor to pull it off. I am confused as to why Foxcatcher was nominated for Best Writing and Best Actor and deserves neither while Nightcrawler is missing the latter, and deserves to win the former. 


Follow me on Twitter - https://twitter.com/MaxBezant